Робітництво УРСР (1946-1965 рр.) у сучасній вітчизняній історіографічній традиції
Анотація
The article examines the modern national historiography of Ukrainian working-class issues of the postwar 20 century (1946-1965). The existence of several methodological levels, the highest of which is philosophical, is the historiographical research specificity. The authors of the article used analysis and synthesis from the list of this group methods. The next level is considered to comprise general scientific methods, of which the method of classification and typologization and the method of idealization (abstraction) were used. Special historical methods are the third gradation of the methods. The research tools of the proposed work include historical and genetic, chronological, problematic and chronological, biographical, comparative historical methods, as well as methods of periodization, content analysis, dialectic of retrospective and prospective analysis.
The authors of the article conclude that the main thesis of the modern national historiography of the problem is the statement that the postwar economic recovery was carried out on a predominantly extensive basis. More than 90% of workers at Ukrainian industrial enterprises achieved production standards mainly by manual labor. Lack of proper safety precautions often resulted in significant injuries. Much was said about the working-class leading role in the society, but little was done to ensure that workers actually managed the enterprises. To a certain extent, this was facilitated by the permanent mobilization and propaganda activities carried out by that period regime, inspiring “socialist competition” and various kinds of “movement of shock workers and innovators.” People’s real, everyday enthusiasm, their readiness for another sacrifice in the name of a better future were closely intertwined with the formalism and demagoguery inherent in the communist system.
The overwhelming majority of contemporary Ukrainian historians support the idea that by rebuilding the economy, people were reviving a normal life for themselves and their children, while the system attributed everything primarily to the “highest interests of the Bolshevik Revolution homeland.” Living and working conditions of people were difficult. Nevertheless, people believed in a better life. This feeling also increased as workers saw that thanks to their valiant labor the country was gradually overcoming enormous difficulties and solving extremely complex tasks of the destroyed economy reviving. However, J. Stalin and his entourage, trying to strengthen the totalitarian regime, rejected the possibility of the country’s development in a democratic direction, and so did those forces interested in preserving the command economy and vulgarized forms of ideology. At the same time, to the researchers’ point of view, it was also crucial that the mass consciousness had no experience of living in a society developing on the principles of democracy, which in itself hindered the understanding of the need for a radical renewal of the entire political system.
Завантаження
Посилання
Ablitsov, V. (2014). Donbas: yevropeiska Ukraina chy aziiske dykopillia? [Donbas: European Ukraine or Asian wilderness?] Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Aleksieieva-Protsiuk, D.O. (2008). Orhanizatsiia utrymannia i trudovoho vykorystannia inozemnykh viiskovopolonenykh ta internovanykh na terytorii Ukrainy (1939-1953 rr.) [Organization of maintenance and labor use of foreign prisoners of war and internees on the territory of Ukraine (1939–1953)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Aleksieieva-Protsiuk, D.O. (2011). Vykorystannia pratsi inozemnykh viiskovopolonenykh ta internovanykh na terytorii Ukrainy (1939-1953): normatyvno-pravovi ta orhanizatsiini zasady [The use of labor of foreign prisoners of war and internees on the territory of Ukraine (1939-1953): legal and organizational principles] Kyiv: Prosvita [in Ukrainian].
Bazhan, O. (2011). Represyvna diialnist orhaniv VUNK-DPU-NKVS-KDB na Kyivshchyni u 1919–1980-ti rr. [Repressive activities of the VUNK-DPU-NKVD-KGB in the Kyiv region in the 1919-1980s]. Z arkhiviv VUChK-GPU-NKVD-KGB – From the archives of the VUCHK-GPU-NKVD-KGB. pp. 156-234 [in Ukrainian].
Bazhan, O.H. & Danyliuk, Yu.Z. (2000). Ukrainskyi natsionalnyi rukh: osnovni tendentsii i etapy rozvytku (kinets 1950-kh – 1980-ti roky) [Ukrainian national movement: main trends and stages of development (late 1950s - 1980s)] Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Danyliuk, Yu.Z. & Bazhan, O.H. (2000). Opozytsiia v Ukraini (druha polovyna 50-kh – 80-ti rr. XX st.) [Opposition in Ukraine (second half of the 50s - 80s of the 20 century)]. Kyiv: Ridnyi Krai [in Ukrainian].
Dodonov, O.F. (2001). Uchast robitnykiv u politychnomu zhytti SRSR. 1961-1991 rr. [Participation of workers in the political life of the USSR. 1961-1991]. (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Dodonov, O.F. (2002). Nove bachennia periodyzatsii istorii radianskoho robitnychoho klasu i yoho istoriohrafii [A new vision of the periodization of the history of the Soviet working class and its historiography]. Kulturolohichnyi visnyk: Naukovo-teoretychnyi shchorichnyk Nyzhnoi Naddniprianshchyny. –Kulturologichesky vestnik: Scientific and Theoretical Yearbook of the Lower Naddniprianshchyna. Issue 8. Zaporizhzhia: Prosvita. Pp. 67-74 [in Ukrainian].
Dodonov, O.F. (2003). Radianska istoriohrafiia pro sudzhennia zakhidnykh doslidnykiv z pytan roli i politychnoi diialnosti robitnychoho klasu u 60–80-i roky XX st. [Soviet Historiography on the Judgments of Western Researchers on the Role and Political Activity of the Working Class in the 60s and 80s of 20 century]. Kulturolohichnyi visnyk: Naukovo-teoretychnyi shchorichnyk Nyzhnoi Naddniprianshchyny. – Kulturologichesky vestnik: Scientific and Theoretical Yearbook of the Lower Naddniprianshchyna. Issue 10. Zaporizhzhia: Prosvita. Pp. 18-20 [in Ukrainian].
Dziuba, I.M. (2015). Donetska rana Ukrainy: Istoryko-kulturolohichni esei [Donetsk wound of Ukraine: Historical and Cultural Essays]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Halchak, S.D. (2012). Stanovyshche tsyvilnykh prymusovykh robitnykiv Raikhu v Ukraini (1945-2010 rr.): istorychni, sotsialno-pobutovi ta pravovi aspekty [The Situation of Civilian Forced Laborers of the Reich in Ukraine (1945-2010)]. (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Holovko, V. (2014). “Tiahar postradianskoi liudyny”: istoriohrafichnyi obraz donetskoi identychnosti [“The Burden of the Post-Soviet Man”: Historiographical Image of Donetsk Identity]. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini. Zb. nauk. Prats – Historiographical Studies in Ukraine. Collection of scientific works. Issue 24. Pp. 38-50 [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsak, Ya. (2005). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia. 1991–2001: Desiatylittia zmin. Ukraina moderna. [Ukrainian historiography. 1991-2001: A decade of changes. Modern Ukraine]. Kyiv-Lviv. Issue 9. Pp. 43-68 [in Ukrainian].
IPiEND imeni I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy (2014). Donbas v etnopolitychnomu vymiri [Donbas in the Ethno-Political Dimension]. Kyiv: I.F. Kuras Institute of Pedagogical and Ethnological Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Ivanenko, V.V. (2003). Bil i zvytiaha: XX stolittia v ukrainskomu vymiri [Pain and Victory: The Twentieth Century in the Ukrainian Dimension]. Dnipropetrovs’k: ART-PRESS [in Ukrainian].
Kalkutina, N.V. (2015). Uchast viiskovopolonenykh Nimechchyny ta yii soiuznykiv u povoiennii vidbudovi Pivdennoi Ukrainy (1944–1950 rr.) [Participation of prisoners of war of Germany and its allies in the post-war reconstruction of Southern Ukraine (1944-1950)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Mykolaiv [in Ukrainian].
Kasianov, H. (1996). Nezghodni: ukrainska intelihentsiia v rusi oporu 1960–80-kh rokiv [Dissenters: Ukrainian intelligentsia in the resistance movement of the 1960s-80s]. Kyiv: Lybid. [in Ukrainian].
Kononenko, V.V. (2004). Suspilno-politychni nastroi ta moralnyi stan naselennia Ukrainy v povoiennyi period (1945–1953 rr.) [Socio-political moods and moral state of the population of Ukraine in the postwar period (1945-1953)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Vinnytsia [in Ukrainian].
Kulchytskyi, S. & Yakubova, L. (2015). Donechchyna i Luhanshchyna u XVII–XXI st.: istorychni faktory y politychni tekhnolohii formuvannia osoblyvoho ta zahalnoho u rehionalnomu prostori [Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the 17th - 21st centuries: historical factors and political technologies of formation of the special and the general in the regional space]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Loboda, M.K. (2007). Vykorystannia trudovykh resursiv u vidbudovi vazhkoi promyslovosti Ukrainy (1943-1950 rr.) [The use of labor resources in the reconstruction of heavy industry in Ukraine (1943-1950)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Loboda, M.K. (2012). Trudovi resursy u vazhkii promyslovosti Ukrainy pid chas natsystskoi okupatsii ta u vidbudovnyi period (1941–1950) [Labor resources in the heavy industry of Ukraine during the Nazi occupation and in the reconstruction period (1941-1950)]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Mozgovskyi, M.V. (2005). Borotba totalitarnoi systemy proty diiachiv ukrainskoi nauky ta kultury v povoiennyi period (1946-1953 rr.) [Struggle of the totalitarian system against the figures of Ukrainian science and culture in the postwar period (1946-1953)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Nefodov, D. (2018). The Ukrainian SSR postwar working class (1946-1965) in the evaluation of the sovietology in the west. East European Historical Bulletin. Issue 7. Pp. 160-172. Retrieved from http://eehb.dspu.edu.ua/article/view/130665/133510
Nefodov, D.V. (2019). Ukrainian workers of the postwar period (1946-1965) in the historiography of the diaspora. Pages of history: Collection of scientific papers. Issue 49. Pp. 179-190. Retrieved from http://history-pages.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/49_13_Nefodov.pdf
Potylchak, O.V. (2005). Radianski rezhymni ustanovy dlia viiskovopolonenykh ta internovanykh v URSR (1939-1954 rr.): orhanizatsiia, dyslokatsiia, struktura [Soviet regime institutions for prisoners of war and internees in the Ukrainian SSR (1939-1954): organization, location, structure]. (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Rabenchuk, O. (2007). Sotsialna aktyvnist ta nastroi naselennia Ukrainy u povoiennyi period (druha polovyna 1940-kh – pochatok 1950-kh rr.) [Social activity and moods of the population of Ukraine in the postwar period (second half of the 1940s - early 1950s)]. Ukraina XX st.: kultura, ideolohiia, polityka: Zbirnyk statei –Ukraine of the twentieth century: culture, ideology, politics: Collection of articles. Issue 12. Pp. 324-339 [in Ukrainian].
Rusnachenko, A.M. (1999). Natsionalno-vyzvolnyi rukh v Ukraini (seredyna 1950-kh – pochatok 1990-kh rokiv) [National Liberation Movement in Ukraine (mid-1950s - early 1990s)]. (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shytiuk, M.M. (2000). Masovi represii proty naselennia Pivdnia Ukrainy v 20–50-ti roky XX stolittia [Mass repressions against the population of the South of Ukraine in the 20-50s of the twentieth century]. Kyiv: TETRA [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V. (2015). Donechchyna i Luhanshchyna: mistse v modernomu ukrainskomu natsionalnomu proekti. Analitychna dopovid [Donetsk and Luhansk regions: a place in the modern Ukrainian national project. Analytical report]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V., Kulchytskyi, S. & Yakubova, L. (2016). Donbas i Krym v ekonomichnomu, suspilno-politychnomu ta etnokulturnomu prostori Ukrainy: istorychnyi dosvid, moderni vyklyky, perspektyvy (Analitychna dopovid) [Donbas and the Crimea in the Economic, Socio-Political and Ethno-Cultural Space of Ukraine: Historical Experience, Modern Challenges, Prospects (Analytical Report)]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Smolii, V., Kulchytskyi, S. & Yakubova, L. (2016). Donbas i Krym: mistse v modernomu natsionalnomu proekti (analitychna zapyska) [Donbas and the Crimea: a place in the modern national project (analytical note)]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukraiian].
Stasiuk, I.M. (2002). Ukrainskyi natsionalno-patriotychnyi rukh v URSR (seredyna 1950-kh – kinets 1980-kh rokiv) [Ukrainian national-patriotic movement in the Ukrainian SSR (mid-1950s - late 1980s)]. (Candidate’s thesis). Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Surhai, O. (2006). Pidhotovka kvalifikovanykh robitnychykh kadriv u zakladakh profesiino-tekhnichnoi osvity Ukrainy u 20-50-i roky XX stolittia (istoriohrafiia problemy) [Training of qualified workers in vocational education institutions of Ukraine in the 20-50s of the twentieth century (historiography of the problem)]. Visnyk of History. Issues 85-86. Pp. 49-52 [in Ukrainian].
Tchaikovskyi, A.C. (2005). Plen. Za chuzhye y svoy hrekhy (Voennoplennыe y ynternyrovannыe v Ukrayne 1939-1953 hh.) [Captivity. For the sins of others and their own (Prisoners of war and internees in Ukraine in 1939-1953)]. Kyiv: Parlamentskoe [in Ukrainian].
Vasylenko, S.M. (2011). Povoienni represii proty naselennia Ukrainy (1944–1953 rr.) [Post-war repressions against the population of Ukraine (1944-1953)]. (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].
Vermenich, Ya.V. (2016). Poshuk modelei konsolidatsii ukrainskoi natsii na rubezhi XIX i XX stolit: pohliad z ponad storichnoi vidstani. Analitychna dopovid [Search for models of consolidation of the Ukrainian nation at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: a view from more than a centur’s distance. Analytical report]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Ya.V. (2015). Donbas u konteksti teorii porubizhzhia: sotsiohumanitarnyi analiz [Donbas in the context of borderland theories: socio-humanitarian analysis]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 1, 108-134 [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Ya.V. (2015). Donbas yak porubizhnyi rehion: terytorialnyi vymir [Donbas as a border region: territorial dimension]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Ya.V. (2015). Pivdenna Ukraina na tsyvilizatsiinomu pohranychchi [Southern Ukraine on the Civilizational Frontier]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Ya.V. (2015). Pivdenna Ukraina: vzaiemovplyvy derzhav ta kultur na tsyvilizatsiinomu pohranychchi. Analitychna zapyska [Southern Ukraine: Mutual Influences of States and Cultures on the Civilizational Frontier. Analytical note]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Yakubova, L.D. (2014). Etnonatsionalna istoriia Donbasu: tendentsii, superechnosti, perspektyvy v svitli suchasnoho etapu ukrainskoho natsiotvorennia [Ethno-national history of Donbas: trends, contradictions, prospects in the light of the current stage of Ukrainian nation-building]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Zakharov, B. (2003) Narys istorii dysydentskoho rukhu v Ukraini (1956-1987) [Essay on the History of the Dissident Movement in Ukraine (1956-1987)]. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Переглядів анотації: 78 Завантажень PDF: 64

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.